Marc Jacobs Beauty Lust & Stardust See-quins Eyeshadows Reviews & Swatches
Glitter Rock
Marc Jacobs Beauty Glitter Rock See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow ($28.00 for 0.12 oz.) has a darker, gray base with subtle, cool undertones packed with a ton of silver shimmer and glitter. It had nearly opaque pigmentation applied dry and had full coverage when applied with a wet brush. The texture was loosely-pressed, slightly drier and chunkier, so there was some fallout during application when I used it dry. To minimize fallout and ensure a smoother application, I’d highly recommend using it with a dampened brush. This shade stayed on well for eight and a half hours and had light fallout over time.
Note: The ingredient list shows Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET glitter) as an ingredient, but there were no warnings on the box nor on the product listing. It turns out that some of the previously released shades also include Polyethylene Terephthalate. The product is marketed for eyes, and it is called eyeshadow. Typically, products containing Polyethylene Terephthalate often come with a warning that they are “not intended for use around the immediate eye area” (like ColourPop Pressed Glitters), but there have been an increasing number of instances where brands include it and market those products for eyes specifically (like Urban Decay Heavy Metal Glitter Gels and Glossier Play Glitter Gelees).
Top Dupes
- Kat Von D Cathedral (LE, ) is more shimmery, darker (90% similar).
- NARS Parallax (LE, $25.00) is lighter, warmer (90% similar).
- MAC Say It Isn't So (P, $18.00) is lighter (90% similar).
- Urban Decay Dark Cloud (P, $20.00) is darker (90% similar).
- NARS Jardin Perdu (Left) (DC, $25.00) is less shimmery, lighter (90% similar).
- Guerlain Les Gris #4 (P, ) is less shimmery, lighter, warmer (90% similar).
- Dior Blue Garden #5 (LE, ) is less shimmery, lighter (85% similar).
- bareMinerals Gunmetal (P, $18.00) is less shimmery, darker, cooler (85% similar).
- Colour Pop Snooze (LE, $5.00) is more shimmery, darker (85% similar).
- Pat McGrath Sterling (LE, $25.00) is lighter, warmer (85% similar).
Formula Overview
$28.00/0.12 oz. - $233.33 Per Ounce
The formula is supposed to add a "super-shimmering dimension to any look" with a "demi-pressed process" that has "high-impact dazzle with smooth glide and bold color." Per the brand, it can be "packed on for intense glitter or blended for a soft wash of sparkle." They recommend packing it on with a fingertip or using a flat, synthetic brush in a "gentle pressing motion." I was surprised at how well they applied with a flat, synthetic brush, as I was able to apply all six shades using a flat, synthetic brush (MAC 247s and 242s) and gently pressed the product against my lid and have most of the product adhere without lots of fallout. When I pressed on an eyeshadow, I gently press and then pull in a direction (depending on what and where I'm applying). The formula yielded very shiny, sparkling color that was intense and bright while still offering pigmentation from the base color, too.
They have a very loosely-packed texture--they seem more like a 40-60% loose product, and it was important to use the included "pigment press" to keep the surface flat. I also found that a little went a long way with most shades, and I could see fallout becoming an issue if too much product was on the brush. I usually just pressed the brush gentle on the surface and that was good enough for coverage on my lid. They lasted for eight and a half hours on me before creasing faintly, and there was slight fallout over time but nothing that reached the point where it seemed distracting/noticeable to anyone looking at me. Frankly, I was extremely impressed with how easily they applied, adhered, and lasted on me while delivering on high impact dazzle and bold color. Using fingertips worked for getting even adhesion, but I have always found it harder to be precise with my fingertips on my lid, and I did feel like my fingertip was picking up more product than I needed so there was a bit more fallout when I attempted using my fingertips.
Browse all of our Marc Jacobs Beauty See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow swatches.
Ingredients
Pop Rox
Marc Jacobs Beauty Pop Rox See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow ($28.00 for 0.12 oz.) is a medium-dark plum with warm undertones and a glittering finish with flashes of gold and pink. It had good color coverage applied dry, but it really needed to be applied with fingertips or a dampened brush for full coverage that also appeared brighter, warmer, and smoother. This shade left a bluish stain behind, too, which was unusual. The consistency felt more loosely-pressed in the jar (as it was) and seemed to have more sparkle/glitter than some of the original shades released in the formula, so there was a touch of fallout during application (though less than you’d expect). It wore well for nine hours on me with very minimal fallout over time.
Note: The ingredient list shows Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET glitter) as an ingredient, but there were no warnings on the box nor on the product listing. It turns out that some of the previously released shades also include Polyethylene Terephthalate. The product is marketed for eyes, and it is called eyeshadow. Typically, products containing Polyethylene Terephthalate often come with a warning that they are “not intended for use around the immediate eye area” (like ColourPop Pressed Glitters), but there have been an increasing number of instances where brands include it and market those products for eyes specifically (like Urban Decay Heavy Metal Glitter Gels and Glossier Play Glitter Gelees).
Top Dupes
- Huda Beauty Ruby #6 (LE, ) is less shimmery, darker (90% similar).
- Colour Pop Something Special (LE, $4.50) is less shimmery, darker (85% similar).
- Marc Jacobs Beauty Blitz Glitz (LE, $28.00) is darker (85% similar).
- Colour Pop Revolution (P, $5.00) is more shimmery, lighter, warmer (80% similar).
- Anastasia Rose Gold (Norvina) (LE, $12.00) is more shimmery, lighter, warmer (80% similar).
- Urban Decay Extragalactic (P, $20.00) is more shimmery, darker (80% similar).
- BH Cosmetics Foil Eyes #23 (PiP, ) is more shimmery, lighter, warmer (80% similar).
- Fenty Beauty Ultraviolit (LE, ) is more shimmery, darker, warmer (80% similar).
Formula Overview
$28.00/0.12 oz. - $233.33 Per Ounce
The formula is supposed to add a "super-shimmering dimension to any look" with a "demi-pressed process" that has "high-impact dazzle with smooth glide and bold color." Per the brand, it can be "packed on for intense glitter or blended for a soft wash of sparkle." They recommend packing it on with a fingertip or using a flat, synthetic brush in a "gentle pressing motion." I was surprised at how well they applied with a flat, synthetic brush, as I was able to apply all six shades using a flat, synthetic brush (MAC 247s and 242s) and gently pressed the product against my lid and have most of the product adhere without lots of fallout. When I pressed on an eyeshadow, I gently press and then pull in a direction (depending on what and where I'm applying). The formula yielded very shiny, sparkling color that was intense and bright while still offering pigmentation from the base color, too.
They have a very loosely-packed texture--they seem more like a 40-60% loose product, and it was important to use the included "pigment press" to keep the surface flat. I also found that a little went a long way with most shades, and I could see fallout becoming an issue if too much product was on the brush. I usually just pressed the brush gentle on the surface and that was good enough for coverage on my lid. They lasted for eight and a half hours on me before creasing faintly, and there was slight fallout over time but nothing that reached the point where it seemed distracting/noticeable to anyone looking at me. Frankly, I was extremely impressed with how easily they applied, adhered, and lasted on me while delivering on high impact dazzle and bold color. Using fingertips worked for getting even adhesion, but I have always found it harder to be precise with my fingertips on my lid, and I did feel like my fingertip was picking up more product than I needed so there was a bit more fallout when I attempted using my fingertips.
Browse all of our Marc Jacobs Beauty See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow swatches.
Ingredients
Smash Glitz
Marc Jacobs Beauty Smash Glitz See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow ($28.00 for 0.12 oz.) is a soft pink with warmer undertones and flecks of silver glitter over a metallic finish. The consistency was more emollient in its base, almost like it was more composed of a ton of shimmer/sparkle/glitter and very little base pigment leaving the base more transparent. I found it was a bit overly emollient so the product slid around rather than adhered and built up or blended out around the edges.
As a result, I ended up with more fallout from fussing with this shade compared to others in the formula. It worked just fine for packing onto the inner tearduct or patting onto the center of the lid for a halo eye, where blending was less critical or spreading over a larger area wasn’t necessary. It had semi-opaque pigmentation applied dry as well as with a dampened brush. It stayed on well for eight hours with light fallout over time.
Note: The ingredient list shows Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET glitter) as an ingredient, but there were no warnings on the box nor on the product listing. It turns out that some of the previously released shades also include Polyethylene Terephthalate. The product is marketed for eyes, and it is called eyeshadow. Typically, products containing Polyethylene Terephthalate often come with a warning that they are “not intended for use around the immediate eye area” (like ColourPop Pressed Glitters), but there have been an increasing number of instances where brands include it and market those products for eyes specifically (like Urban Decay Heavy Metal Glitter Gels and Glossier Play Glitter Gelees).
Top Dupes
- MAC Whisper Pink (LE, $21.00) is more shimmery, lighter (90% similar).
- Tom Ford Beauty White Suede (Nordstrom) #1 (LE, ) is more shimmery, lighter, cooler (85% similar).
- BH Cosmetics Carli Bybel Deluxe Edition #6 (LE, ) is lighter, warmer (85% similar).
- Colour Pop Can't Party Wait (LE, ) is lighter (85% similar).
- Urban Decay Specter (PiP, $20.00) is lighter, warmer (85% similar).
- Tom Ford Beauty Cool (Winter 2016) Eyeshadow #1 (LE, ) is less shimmery, lighter, warmer (85% similar).
- Coloured Raine Hi Cutie (LE, $6.99) is darker, cooler (85% similar).
- NARS Atomic (LE, $22.00) is lighter, warmer (85% similar).
- Maybelline Rose Riot (140) (LE, $6.99) is less shimmery, lighter (85% similar).
- MAC Noble Descent (LE, $19.50) is lighter, warmer (85% similar).
Formula Overview
$28.00/0.12 oz. - $233.33 Per Ounce
The formula is supposed to add a "super-shimmering dimension to any look" with a "demi-pressed process" that has "high-impact dazzle with smooth glide and bold color." Per the brand, it can be "packed on for intense glitter or blended for a soft wash of sparkle." They recommend packing it on with a fingertip or using a flat, synthetic brush in a "gentle pressing motion." I was surprised at how well they applied with a flat, synthetic brush, as I was able to apply all six shades using a flat, synthetic brush (MAC 247s and 242s) and gently pressed the product against my lid and have most of the product adhere without lots of fallout. When I pressed on an eyeshadow, I gently press and then pull in a direction (depending on what and where I'm applying). The formula yielded very shiny, sparkling color that was intense and bright while still offering pigmentation from the base color, too.
They have a very loosely-packed texture--they seem more like a 40-60% loose product, and it was important to use the included "pigment press" to keep the surface flat. I also found that a little went a long way with most shades, and I could see fallout becoming an issue if too much product was on the brush. I usually just pressed the brush gentle on the surface and that was good enough for coverage on my lid. They lasted for eight and a half hours on me before creasing faintly, and there was slight fallout over time but nothing that reached the point where it seemed distracting/noticeable to anyone looking at me. Frankly, I was extremely impressed with how easily they applied, adhered, and lasted on me while delivering on high impact dazzle and bold color. Using fingertips worked for getting even adhesion, but I have always found it harder to be precise with my fingertips on my lid, and I did feel like my fingertip was picking up more product than I needed so there was a bit more fallout when I attempted using my fingertips.
Browse all of our Marc Jacobs Beauty See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow swatches.
Ingredients
Star Dust
Marc Jacobs Beauty Star Dust See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow ($28.00 for 0.12 oz.) is a bright, medium orange with strong, warm undertones and flashes of gold and pink sparkle and glitter. It had good pigmentation applied dry as well as with a dampened brush with the dampened application yielding a brighter, more sparkling finish that looked smoother on my skin. The texture was loosely pressed but had good adherence and minimal fallout (especially considering how much sparkle and glitter was in it!), and it was easy to blend out along the edges. Its lasted well for nine hours on me with very little fallout over time.
Note: The ingredient list shows Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET glitter) as an ingredient, but there were no warnings on the box nor on the product listing. It turns out that some of the previously released shades also include Polyethylene Terephthalate. The product is marketed for eyes, and it is called eyeshadow. Typically, products containing Polyethylene Terephthalate often come with a warning that they are “not intended for use around the immediate eye area” (like ColourPop Pressed Glitters), but there have been an increasing number of instances where brands include it and market those products for eyes specifically (like Urban Decay Heavy Metal Glitter Gels and Glossier Play Glitter Gelees).
Top Dupes
- Linda Hallberg Cosmetics Moonwake (PiP, ) is lighter (90% similar).
- Natasha Denona Peach (P, $28.00) is lighter, warmer (90% similar).
- Pat McGrath VR Violet (PiP, $25.00) is more muted, cooler (90% similar).
- Natasha Denona Awakening (PiP, $29.00) is less shimmery, lighter (90% similar).
- Bad Habit Sky's the Limit (PiP, ) is less shimmery, lighter (85% similar).
- Colour Pop Strawberry Jam (P, $8.00) is lighter, warmer (85% similar).
- Make Up For Ever 108 Burgundy (P, $26.00) is darker (85% similar).
- Natasha Denona Botanic (192M) (PiP, $29.00) is less shimmery, lighter, warmer (85% similar).
- Colour Pop Rayon (PiP, $4.50) is darker (85% similar).
- Colour Pop Miser (LE, $4.50) is lighter, cooler (80% similar).
Formula Overview
$28.00/0.12 oz. - $233.33 Per Ounce
The formula is supposed to add a "super-shimmering dimension to any look" with a "demi-pressed process" that has "high-impact dazzle with smooth glide and bold color." Per the brand, it can be "packed on for intense glitter or blended for a soft wash of sparkle." They recommend packing it on with a fingertip or using a flat, synthetic brush in a "gentle pressing motion." I was surprised at how well they applied with a flat, synthetic brush, as I was able to apply all six shades using a flat, synthetic brush (MAC 247s and 242s) and gently pressed the product against my lid and have most of the product adhere without lots of fallout. When I pressed on an eyeshadow, I gently press and then pull in a direction (depending on what and where I'm applying). The formula yielded very shiny, sparkling color that was intense and bright while still offering pigmentation from the base color, too.
They have a very loosely-packed texture--they seem more like a 40-60% loose product, and it was important to use the included "pigment press" to keep the surface flat. I also found that a little went a long way with most shades, and I could see fallout becoming an issue if too much product was on the brush. I usually just pressed the brush gentle on the surface and that was good enough for coverage on my lid. They lasted for eight and a half hours on me before creasing faintly, and there was slight fallout over time but nothing that reached the point where it seemed distracting/noticeable to anyone looking at me. Frankly, I was extremely impressed with how easily they applied, adhered, and lasted on me while delivering on high impact dazzle and bold color. Using fingertips worked for getting even adhesion, but I have always found it harder to be precise with my fingertips on my lid, and I did feel like my fingertip was picking up more product than I needed so there was a bit more fallout when I attempted using my fingertips.
Browse all of our Marc Jacobs Beauty See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow swatches.
Ingredients
Marc Jacobs Beauty Glitter Rock See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Glitter Rock See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Glitter Rock See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Glitter Rock See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Glitter Rock See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Glitter Rock See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Holiday 2019 | Look Details
Marc Jacobs Beauty Holiday 2019 | Look Details
Marc Jacobs Beauty Pop Rox See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Pop Rox See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Pop Rox See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Pop Rox See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Pop Rox See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Pop Rox See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Smash Glitz See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Smash Glitz See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Smash Glitz See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Smash Glitz See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Smash Glitz See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Smash Glitz See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Smash Glitz See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Star Dust See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Star Dust See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Star Dust See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Star Dust See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Star Dust See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Star Dust See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Glitter Rock See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Glitter Rock See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Glitter Rock See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Glitter Rock See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Glitter Rock See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Glitter Rock See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Holiday 2019 | Look Details
Marc Jacobs Beauty Holiday 2019 | Look Details
Marc Jacobs Beauty Pop Rox See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Pop Rox See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Pop Rox See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Pop Rox See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Pop Rox See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Pop Rox See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Smash Glitz See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Smash Glitz See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Smash Glitz See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Smash Glitz See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Smash Glitz See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Smash Glitz See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Smash Glitz See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Star Dust See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Star Dust See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Star Dust See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Star Dust See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Star Dust See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
Marc Jacobs Beauty Star Dust See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow
from Temptalia https://ift.tt/2Hh2Pcy
Visit Feminine Well Being blog for interesting articles like this!
Comments
Post a Comment